You're ready to scale in Europe. You have two choices: Amazon FBA (Fulfillment by Amazon) or a 3PL (3rd Party Logistics). Both work. Both fail. The decision depends on what you're optimizing for.
We've worked with 250+ brands on both paths. Here's the comparison based on real operations.
You send your inventory to Amazon's warehouse. Amazon handles picking, packing, shipping, returns, and customer service. You pay per unit fulfilled plus storage fees. Amazon owns the customer relationship for FBA orders.
Pros:
Cons:
You hire a logistics partner (a third-party logistics provider) to manage your warehouse, picking, packing, shipping, and returns. You retain customer relationships and brand control. You pay a base fee plus per-unit fees.
Pros:
Cons:
For a brand fulfilling 5,000 orders per month across 3 European countries:
FBA (Amazon-only sales):
3PL (Multi-channel, 3 countries):
Wait — 3PL is more expensive? Yes, in this scenario. But look at the reality:
FBA Reality (same numbers):
3PL Reality:
The real cost isn't just the FBA vs 3PL fees. It's the lost revenue from inability to sell on other channels, lost brand control, lost pricing power, and higher returns.
FBA only works if Amazon is your only channel. Most brands selling in Europe use 3–5 channels:
If you use FBA for Amazon, you need a separate 3PL for your own store and bol.com and Zalando. That means managing two fulfillment operations, two inventory systems, two sets of carriers. That's coordination nightmare.
If you use 3PL for everything, you have one inventory system, one set of SKUs, one carrier relationship, one reporting dashboard. Everything flows through one system.
The operational simplicity of 3PL compounds the economics in your favour when you're multi-channel.
FBA makes sense if:
FBA is great for new brands testing a market. You send 500 units, Amazon handles everything, you learn what sells. If it works, graduate to 3PL and multi-channel. If it doesn't, you haven't wasted money on a 3PL contract.
3PL makes sense if:
3PL is the choice for serious, multi-channel, multi-country brands. It's the way to scale.
Some brands use both: FBA for Amazon Prime badge and speed, 3PL for bol.com and own store. This works but creates complexity and double-inventory management.
We don't recommend it. Choose one and optimize for it. If you're multi-channel, optimize for 3PL. If you're Amazon-only, optimize for FBA.
If you choose 3PL, how do you pick a partner? Look for:
Cost is less important than capability. A cheap 3PL that can't integrate to your systems or manage returns properly will cost you far more in lost sales and customer churn.
Ask yourself:
Q: Are you selling on multiple channels (own store + Amazon + bol.com, etc.)?
A: Yes → Use 3PL
A: No → Use FBA (if Amazon only) or 3PL (if own store only)
Q: Do you have >2,000 orders/month?
A: Yes → 3PL is cheaper and more flexible
A: No → FBA for simplicity, or small 3PL for control
Q: Do you care about brand control and customer relationships?
A: Yes → 3PL (you own the customer)
A: No → FBA is fine
Q: Are you scaling to 2+ European countries?
A: Yes → 3PL with local hubs per country
A: No → FBA or single-country 3PL
FBA is great for getting started with Amazon at zero operational cost. 3PL is the way to scale across multiple channels and countries with lower unit costs and full brand control.
Most brands start on FBA, test the market, then graduate to 3PL when they hit €2M+ revenue and 2+ channels. That's the proven path.
Choose based on your channel strategy, not just cost. And choose a partner with real geographic and operational depth, not just low prices.
Ready to evaluate FBA vs 3PL for your brand?
Get a Fulfillment Strategy Recommendation →